viewing time toward active versus inactive stimuli model

Psychophysiological responses to eye contact in a live interaction and in video call

shutter window participant model participant participant model model
gaze direction times condition within subject anova
direction times condition times time within subject anova

P300 development from infancy to adolescence

re 6- -2 ;z ito ; 00 ;z n=00 z 5 H 1 se,0 k - o 6 .0 1 t=.7 2 - ilum radd tseg .4-1 .,14 tio70 it tan tra 82 .8 ra S s 0

The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension

P300 in detecting concealed information and deception: A review

Components in the P300: Don't forget the Novelty P3!

A differential role for human hippocampus in novelty and contextual processing: Implications for P300

A systematic review of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness on P3b

:11=rfreom irsecex tleacnykw s500p0 m lisundouw litaapudnm fs52o±m 32254±m tti sspuom,/:s12PPC /4 e 3 it 9 n=3
tro 6=.7 x 4 ± n=.5 ti M M • • • o P om iito ak cen 0- um :tse i eaP tla 2 s S 3

Effects of relevance and response frequency on P3b amplitudes: Review of findings and comparison of hypotheses about the process reflected by P3b

30+ years of P300 brain-computer interfaces

Significance?... Significance! Empirical, methodological, and theoretical connections between the late positive potential and P300 as neural responses to stimulus significance: An integrative review

Preceding stimulus sequence effects on the oddball-P300 in young and healthy older adults

relatively long target totarget intervals

CP1 Preceding standards Preceding standards2 Preceding standards3 Constant B<=>.06552 -.00804 .00024 -.08332 .07287 -.00867 .00025 -.09880

P3 amplitude reductions are associated with shared variance between internalizing and externalizing psychopathology

2 times 4 repeated measures general linear model
smaller residual unique effect picture categories secondary analysis

remaining 54 (43.2%, range=.06-27, M=.1408, SD=.055) participants fellwithinthe middle 50%
study had 70% power detect r=.193, 80% detect r=.220
novel/target P3 factor scores female M SD=0.14 (0.88) male M SD=-0.18 (0.68
P3 amplitude novel stimuli female M SD=11.0 (5.9) μV male M SD=9.2 (5.4