three factors produced comparability coefficient

Attentional Bias Temporal Dynamics in Remitted Depression

press thereby it permits computation of index
shaded cells reflect zero order correlation

F(2,175)<=>8.79 -9.91, p<=>.01, p2 Mean TL BSTOWARD Sad Happy Mean TL BSAWAY Sad Happy TL BS Variability Sad Happy .041-.047

Reduced Model-Based Decision-Making in Schizophrenia

they generate precise quantitative estimates
relative contributions of putative model
parameter estimates reflecting diminished modelbased
stateaction reward state action temporal difference learning algorithm

High Resolution Examination of the Role of Sleep Disturbance in Predicting Functioning and Psychotic Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Novel Experience Sampling Study

This article was published Online First June 30, 2016. Institute, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. E-mail:  nhs.net or

novel integration of experience sampling method

The Reciprocal Predictive Relationship Between High-Risk Personality and Drinking: An 8-Wave Longitudinal Study in Early Adolescents

Elizabeth N. Riley, Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences,

A Multimethod Examination of Negative Behaviors During Couples Interactions and Problem Drinking Trajectories

Latent-Variable Modeling of Brain Gray-Matter Volume and Psychopathy in Incarcerated Offenders

avoid falsely rejecting viable latent variable model

Theory of Mind Is Not Theory of Emotion: A Cautionary Note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test

Beth F. M. Oakley, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge,

Current Evolutionary Adaptiveness of Psychiatric Disorders: Fertility Rates, Parent Child Relationship Quality, and Psychiatric Disorders Across the Lifespan

generalised additive structural equation model
four different confirmatory factor model

relationship qualitybetweenages 26-36 peak beta 1.003, CI [1.607, 0.400], Z<=>3.260, p<=>.001
relationship qualitybetweenages 15-18 peak beta 8.500, CI [12.807, 4.193], Z<=>3.868, p<=>.001
relationship qualitybetweenages 26-35 peak beta2.751, CI [4.148, 1.353], Z<=>3.858, p<=>.001
relationship qualitybetweenages 16-21 peak beta 1.513, CI [2.450, 0.577], Z<=>3.167, p<=>.002
relationship qualitybetweenage 15-19 peak beta 5.467, CI [7.760, 3.174], Z<=>4.673, p<=>.001
relationship qualitybetweenages 31-32 peak beta 3.533, CI [7.062, 0.005], Z<=>1.963, p<=>.049