analysis entails 2 critical methodological
two stage least squares instrumental variables regression

Opportunity/Threat Perception and Inertia in Response to Discontinuous Change: Replicating and Extending Gilbert (2005)

chronological structure of gilbert model

Psychological Ownership: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Multiple Forms of Attachment in the Workplace

1994 kendall rank correlation coefficient
kendall rank correlation coefficient test
full information maximum likelihood estimation method
standard deviation of sample size weighted observed correlation
sdrho standard deviation of corrected correlation

Leaving Work at Work: A Meta-Analysis on Employee Recovery From Work

sdr samplesize weighted observed standard deviation of correlation

Punishing the Perpetrator of Incivility: The Differential Roles of Moral Identity and Moral Thinking Orientation

six factor measurement model provided satisfactory model

chi2=293.98, df=120 comparative fit index CFI=.93 incremental fit index IFI=.93

How Do Authoritarian Leadership and Abusive Supervision Jointly Thwart Follower Proactivity? A Social Control Perspective

chi2=224.58, df=164 comparative fit index CFI=.98; Tucker Lewis index TLI=.97

The Role of Firm Size and Knowledge Intensity in the Performance Effects of Collective Turnover

Killing Me Softly: Organizational E-mail Monitoring Expectations' Impact on Employee and Significant Other Well-Being

analyzing actor partner interdependence model

CEO Greed, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Organizational Resilience to Systemic Shocks

Knowledge Recombination and Inventor Networks: The Asymmetric Effects of Embeddedness on Knowledge Reuse and Impact

Simon J. D. Schillebeeckx Yimin Lin Gerard George

Performance Feedback Persistence: Comparative Effects of Historical Versus Peer Performance Feedback on Innovative Search

quasi maximum likelihood linear dynamic panel data estimation

Whatever It Takes: How and When Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality Motivates Employee Contributions in the Workplace

coded male=1, female=2; T1=Time 1; T2=Time 2; T3=Time 3
tive fit index=.87, Tucker Lewis index=.85
indirect effect=.10, SE=.04, 95% confidence interval CI=[.03.18]