Children's Global Assessment Scale score<=30 Shaffer et al., 1983

The intergenerational impact of war: longitudinal relationships between caregiver and child mental health in postconflict Sierra Leone

parallel outcome scales allowing estimation

Early childhood behavioral inhibition, adult psychopathology and the buffering effects of adolescent social networks: a twenty-year prospective study

parametric bootstrap likelihood ratio test

Phenotypic and genetic associations between reading comprehension, decoding skills, and ADHD dimensions: evidence from two population-based studies

formal correlated factors multivariate genetic model

Pathways from maternal depressive symptoms to adolescent depressive symptoms: the unique contribution of irritability symptoms

Practitioner Review: Self-injurious behaviour in children with developmental delay

Using self-reported callous-unemotional traits to cross-nationally assess the DSM-5 'With Limited Prosocial Emotions' specifier

M=14.63, SD=2.05 youth (52% girls) recruited from middle (49.3%
Item discriminations>1.70 are considered very high discriminators,between1.35

Is cognitive bias modification training truly beneficial for adolescents?

values represent pearson correlation coefficient

Implicit sequence learning in juvenile anorexia nervosa: neural mechanisms and the impact of starvation

modelling nonindependence across parameter estimates

Effect of housing relocation and neighborhood environment on adolescent mental and behavioral health

Attention bias and anxiety in young children exposed to family violence

log likelihood=2102, Bayesian Information Criterion BIC=4438

Family Nurture Intervention in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit improves social-relatedness, attention, and neurodevelopment of preterm infants at 18 months in a randomized controlled trial

birth weight<third percentile maternal age<18
criteria N=79 Non English speaker N=17 Illness following delivery N=15
N=150 Infants DecliNed participation N=19 Mother overwhelmed N=23 Father refused N=21 Trial follow up too long N=13
area N=27 Not interested N=36 Never decided Other reason N=76 Early discharge N=43 Unable approach N=19 Transferring other facility N=19
care N=72 Received family nurture intervention N=78 N=29 Lost follow up N=5 Transferred N=20 Lost follow up 18 Months corrected age N=37 BSID III N=31 CBCL N=31 M CHAT 18 Months corrected age N=45 BSID III N=45 CBCL N=26 M CHAT 7
scores<85 indicate mild moderate developmental delay Vohr et al., 2012
only 7.7% met reevaluation criteria by failing>=3