John E. Lochman, Kristina L. McDonald, and

New Fathers' Parenting Quality: Personal, Contextual, and Child Precursors

1984 multiple determinants of parenting model

Do Workplace Characteristics Moderate the Effects of Attitudes on Father Warmth and Engagement?

Dyadic Latent Profile Analyses and Multilevel Modeling to Examine Differential Response to Couple Relationship Education

Longitudinal Links Between Parents' Mental Health, Parenting, and Adolescents' Mental Health: Moderation by Adolescent Sex

Day-to-Day Spillover and Long-Term Transmission of Interparental Conflict to Adolescent-Mother Conflict: The Role of Mood

random intercept crosslagged panel model
within family dynamics consist of estimates

Early Home Learning Environment Predicts Early Adolescents' Adjustment Through Cognitive Abilities in Middle Childhood

This article was published Online First May 7, 2020.

Sibling Relationships of Children and Adolescents With Mental Disorders-Resource or Risk Factor?

Emma G. Gotti Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Effects of an Adolescent Depression Prevention Program on Maternal Criticisms and Positive Remarks

Gaining a New Perspective on the Quality of Parent-Adolescent Relationships From Adolescent Speech Samples

children fourth edition verbal comprehension index

Unidirectional and Bidirectional Relationships Between Financial Parenting and Financial Self-Efficacy: Does Student Loan Status Matter?

create 3 indicators of financial role model
cross lagged structural equation analysis
take out student loans structural equation model
causal pathways linking parental role model
pathways between wave 2 parental financial model

Family Economic Hardship and Child Outcomes: Test of Family Stress Model in the Chinese Context

ind scyp tfoh re la partially constrained model

Family Socioeconomic Status and Chinese Preschoolers' Social Skills: Examining Underlying Family Processes

indirect effect 1.58, Sobel Z<=>3.03, p<=>.002
indirect effect 0.21, Sobel Z<=>2.10, p<=>.036
indirect effect 0.22, Sobel Z<=>2.12, p<=>.034
indirect effect 0.01, Sobel Z<=>2.02, p<=>.043