Enactivism and Ecological Psychology: The Role of Bodily Experience in Agency

Statistical Learning Model of the Sense of Agency

E10">θ k + 1=θ k - eta k -1 g (θ k),</disp formula><disp formula id="E11
</disp formula>, eta k>0, ∑ k=1 ∞ eta k -1
E12">p (x | μ) alpha exp (L (x, μ)</disp formula><disp formula id="E13
G 0 (μ)</disp formula><disp formula id="E16">G 0 (μ)=-μ 2
E19">Z i t, μ i t, σ i t=arg min Z, μ, σ ∑ j=1 14

Temporal Expressions in English and Spanish: Influence of Typology and Metaphorical Construal

Together Apart: The Mitigating Role of Digital Communication Technologies on Negative Affect During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy

Unmet Supportive Care Needs Among Women With Breast and Gynecological Cancer: Relevance of Attachment Anxiety and Psychological Distress

Character Strengths Predict an Increase in Mental Health and Subjective Well-Being Over a One-Month Period During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown

Time 2, Fchange(1345)=9.16, p=0.003 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 2.1%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=5.08, p=0.025 intellectual strengths predicted an additional 0.8%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=4.20, p=0.041 goodness strengths predicted an additional 1.3%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=11.86, p=0.001 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 0.8%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=6.16, p=0.013 intellectual strengths predicted an additional 1%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=11.22, p=0.001 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 2.5%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=14.58, p<0.001 intellectual strengths predicted an additional 2.6%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=15.37, p<0.001 goodness strengths predicted an additional 1.9%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=5.93, p=0.015 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 1.3%

Time 2, Fchange(1345)=9.16, p=0.003 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 2.1%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=10.41, p=0.001
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=5.08, p=0.025 intellectual strengths predicted an additional 0.8%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=4.20, p=0.041 goodness strengths predicted an additional 1.3%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=6.43, p=0.012
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=11.86, p=0.001 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 0.8%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=6.16, p=0.013 intellectual strengths predicted an additional 1%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=7.70, p=0.006
p=0.08
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=11.22, p=0.001 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 2.5%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=14.58, p<0.001 intellectual strengths predicted an additional 2.6%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=15.37, p<0.001 goodness strengths predicted an additional 1.9%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=11.32, p=0.001
p=0.07
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=5.93, p=0.015 interpersonal strengths predicted an additional 1.3%
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=6.86, p=0.009
Time 2, Fchange(1345)=4.47, p=0.035