Attachment Style, Early Childhood Trauma, Alexithymia, and Dissociation Among Persons Addicted to Alcohol: Structural Equation Model of Dependencies

short michigan alcoholism screening test

Video Game Addiction and Emotional States: Possible Confusion Between Pleasure and Happiness?

Is Teaching Less Challenging for Career Switchers? First and Second Career Teachers' Appraisal of Professional Challenges and Their Intention to Leave Teaching

Contributions of Positive Psychology in Self-Regulated Learning: A Study With Brazilian Undergraduate Students

multiple linear regression enabled building model

School Incivility and Academic Burnout: The Mediating Role of Perceived Peer Support and the Moderating Role of Future Academic Self-Salience

more sophisticated dream content analysis

Personality and Cognitive Functions in Violent Offenders - Implications of Character Maturity?

one factorial between groups multivariate anova

F(8,224)=1.49, p=0.16; Pillai's Trace=0.10partialeta squared=0.05

Measurement Invariance of the Prosocial Behavior Scale in Three Hispanic Countries (Argentina, Spain, and Peru)

assessing local independence within sem model

Peru Spain=80.7%; PSR Peru Argentina=78.4% PSR Spain Argentina=95.8%
delta CFI=0.005, delta TLI=0.001, delta SRMR=0.004
delta CFI=0.005, delta TLI=0.001, delta SRMR=0.008

Traumatic Stress, Attachment Style, and Health Outcomes in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients

chi^2, CFI<0.95, RMSEA<0.07, ands ranging from 2-3

A Visual Remote Associates Test and Its Validation

Emotional Reaction to Fear- and Disgust-Evoking Snakes: Sensitivity and Propensity in Snake-Fearful Respondents

post hoc nemenyi multiple comparison test

n=330; high fear group n=143; high disgust group n=171
n=172; high fear group n=44; high disgust group=71

Providing Services During Times of Change: Can Employees Maintain Their Levels of Empowerment, Work Engagement and Service Quality Through a Job Crafting Intervention?

H1a H1d are rejected F increasing structural resources=0.57, p=n.s. F increasing social resources=0.16, p=n.s. F decreasing hindering demands=2.61, p=n.s. F increasing challenging demands=0.90
ANOVAs H2a is rejected F work engagement=0.66
H2b is accepted F empowerment=4.33, p=0.04
task performance=1.50, p=n.s., t sevice oriented task performance=0.61, p=n.s. F empowering service=0.004, p=n.s., t empowering service=-0.41