multilevel bifactor structural equation model
model approach allows quite different model
called multitrait multimethod confirmatory factor analysis
systematic investigation of multilevel latent variable model
model based missing data estimation algorithm

RMSEA=+0.004, delta CFI=-0.003, delta TLI=-0.004, delta SRMRwithin=0.000
MG2 delta RMSEA=+0.005, delta CFI=-0.006, delta TLI=-0.007, delta SRMRwithin=+0.012
MG3 delta RMSEA=0.000, delta CFI=0.000, delta TLI=-0.001, delta SRMRwithin=0.000
RMSEA=+0.005, delta CFI=-0.006, delta TLI=-0.006, delta SRMRwithin=+0.012
RMSEA=+0.005, delta CFI=-0.007, delta TLI=-0.007, delta SRMRwithin=+0.012
RMSEA=+0.004, delta CFI=-0.007, delta TLI=-0.005, delta SRMRwithin=+0.012
RMSEA=-0.001, delta CFI=-0.001, delta TLI=+0.001, delta SRMRwithin=+0.005
RMSEA=-0.001, delta CFI=-0.001, delta TLI=+0.002, delta SRMRwithin=+0.005

Working alliance inventory applied to virtual and augmented reality (WAI-VAR): psychometrics and therapeutic outcomes

figure 1 removedgraphic spearman correlation

Square bananas, blue horses: the relative weight of shape and color in concept recognition and representation

color vs shape vs absent mixed factor anova
color vs shape vs baseline mixed factor anova
absent vs manipulability vs agency mixed factor anova

ranging from 26-32 years old, M=28.08, SD=2.23
ranging from 28-42 years old, M=32.00, SD=5.76
ranging from 25-40 years old; M=32.00; SD=4.23
M=3.40 agency M=5.38, post hoc Tukey's HSD ps>0.99

Implicit beliefs about ideal body image predict body image dissatisfaction

spearman rank order correlation coefficient
spearman brown corrected mean split half correlation

Dopaminergic modulation of positive expectations for goal-directed action: evidence from Parkinson's disease

Preference reversal in quantum decision theory

standard properties<disp formula id="E6">∑ n f (π n)=1, 0<=f (π n)<=1
E7">∑ n alpha | b alpha | 2<n alpha | rho^| n alpha>=1
interval<disp formula id="E9">-1<=q (π n)<=1
alternation property<disp formula id="E10">∑ n q (π n)=0
quarter law<disp formula id="E11">1 N ∑ n=1 N | q (π n) |=1 4
we have<disp formula id="E15">q (π 1) + q (π 2)=0
only if<disp formula id="E16">f (π 2) - f (π 1)<2 q (π 1
alternation property<disp formula id="E19">q (π 3) + q (π 4)=0
occurs only when<disp formula id="E20">f (π 4) - f (π 3)<2 q (π 3
criterion<disp formula id="E23">-1 2<f (π 2) - f (π 1)<1 2
expected utilities<disp formula id="E25">U (L 1)=32 9, U (L 2)=40 9
two inequalities (20) read<disp formula id="E31">-0
| 0, 0. 69 }.</disp formula>Their expected utilities are<disp formula id="E33">U (L 1)=97, U (L 2)=124
Since<disp formula id="E39">f (π 2) - f (π 1)=0
expected utilities<disp formula id="E41">U (L 1)=11
lottery according-<disp formula id="E43">p (π 1)=0
relations<disp formula id="E47">f (π 2) - f (π 1)=-0
irrationality measure<disp formula id="E49">delta j=1 N ∑ n=1 N | q (π j) |.</disp formula>Then delta 1