typical live voice test presentation method

Frequency-dependent changes in the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in internet gaming disorder

TR=240 ms echo time TE=2.46 ms flip angle FA=90

Children's spontaneous emotional expressions while receiving (un)wanted prizes in the presence of peers

M 8 year olds=4.48, SD 8 year olds=0.55; M 11 year olds=4.47, SD 11 year olds=0.55
M firstprize=4.93, SD firstprize=0.51 M consolationprize=4.04, SD consolationprize=0.65
M firstprize=4.54, SD firstprize=0.57 M consolationprize=4.40, SD consolationprize=0.58
computer=4.61, SD computer=0.50 M presentpeer=4.35, SD presentpeer=0.68
computer=4.23, SD computer=0.53 M presentpeer=4.71, SD presentpeer=0.62
computer=4.57, SD computer=0.53 M presentpeer=4.89, SD presentpeer=0.60
computer=4.27, SD computer=0.52 M presentpeer=4.17, SD presentpeer=0.67
M firstprize=4.58, SD firstprize=0.45 M consolationprize=3.94, SD consolationprize=0.49
M firstprize=4.41, SD firstprize=0.43 M consolationprize=4.11, SD consolationprize=0.51
M inital=4.46, SD initial=0.45 M secondary=4.07, SD secondary=0.49
M inital=3.88, SD inital=0.47 M secondary=4.64, SD secondary=0.49

Imitation by combination: preschool age children evidence summative imitation in a novel problem-solving task

effectively aggregate information across model
do children imitatively combine responses across model
combine 2 different demonstrated events across different model

Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions

MeanDiff=0.92, p=0.046, 95% CI male expresser female expresser [0.017, 1.83]
MeanDiff=5.28, p=0.014, 95% CI male expresser female expresser [1.12, 9.43]
MeanDiff=7.14, p=0.002, 95% CI male expresser female expresser [2.68, 11.60]

The linguistic roots of natural pedagogy

Adoptive parenting and attachment: association of the internal working models between adoptive mothers and their late-adopted children during adolescence

Why language really is not a communication system: a cognitive view of language evolution