rs M=56%, high neuroscience exposure M=46%
rs M=76%, high neuroscience exposure M=78%
rs M=71%, high neuroscience exposure M=68%
rs M=59%, high neuroscience exposure M=50%
eta2(p)=0.035, those who reported taking many neuroscience courses endorsed 1.3

eta2=0.035, those who reported taking many neuroscience courses endorsed 1.3

Deadly Attraction - Attentional Bias toward Preferred Cigarette Brand in Smokers

Getting a Grip on the Handgrip Task: Handgrip Duration Correlates with Neuroticism But Not Conscientiousness

Pro-ana versus Pro-recovery: A Content Analytic Comparison of Social Media Users' Communication about Eating Disorders on Twitter and Tumblr

The Structure and Measurement of Unusual Sensory Experiences in Different Modalities: The Multi-Modality Unusual Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (MUSEQ)

suggest non negligible lifetime estimates
estimations of alternative comparative fit index

RMSEAs<0.08 good absolute close fit<0.05
Index TLIs>0.90 good incremental close fit>0.95
omega s=0.26 typical visual omega s=0.14 relatively small olfactory omega s=0.24 typical gustatory omega s=0.29 typical bodily sensations omega s=0.21
auditory alpha=0.82 visual alpha=0.88 olfactory alpha=0.87 gustatory alpha=0.88 bodily sensations alpha=0.88 sensed presence alpha=0.77
auditory alpha=0.86 visual alpha=0.91 olfactory alpha=0.92 gustatory alpha=0.93 bodily sensations alpha=0.88 sensed presence alpha=0.85
omega s=0.23 typical visual omega s=0.19 relatively small olfactory omega s=0.18 relatively small gustatory omega s=0.22 typical bodily sensations omega s=0.15

omega=0.26, typical visual omega=0.14, relatively smolfactory omega=0.24, typical gustatory omega=0.29, typical bodily sensations omega=0.21
omega=0.23, typical visual omega=0.19, relatively smolfactory omega=0.18, relatively smgustatory omega=0.22, typical bodily sensations omega=0.15

Burnout Disrupts Anxiety Buffer Functioning Among Nurses: A Three-Way Interaction Model

When Saying Sorry May Not Help: The Impact of Apologies on Social Rejections