Testing the Efficacy of a 1-Day Police Decision-Making and Autonomic Modulation Intervention: A Quasi-Random Pragmatic Controlled Trial

within between interaction power analysis
time analysis times 3 variables 12 pairwise analysis

1betweengroups + 3withingroup time analyses*3 variables=12

Negative Emotion Differentiation Attenuates the Within-Person Indirect Effect of Daily Stress on Nightly Sleep Quality Through Calmness

non symmetric bayesian credibility interval
non symmetric 95% bayesian credibility interval
first stage multilevel conditional process model
random slope terms whose 95% credibility intervals

at high (M + 1 SD) NED, simple slope estimate=-0.189, 95% CI (-0.226, -0.151)

The Impact of the Aussie Optimism Program on the Emotional Coping of 5- to 6-Year-Old Children

Development of a Chinese College Students' Attitudes Toward Sexual Swear Words Scale

Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Stigma in China: A Descriptive Study

Identifying Methamphetamine Abstainers With Convolutional Neural Networks and Short-Time Fourier Transform

model classification accuracy obtained during model

FOV=220 mm, matrix=64*64, flip angle=80°, voxel size=3.4*3.4*3.4 mm^3, slice thickness=4

Moderating Multiple Mediation Model of the Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employee Innovative Behavior

tive fit index CFI=0.938, Tucker Lewis index TLI=0.934

Time Spent on School-Related Activities at Home During the Pandemic: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social Group Inequality Among Secondary School Students

Beliefs About Transitional Events: The Effect of Experience and Life-Script Consistency

they provided likelihood of occurrence estimates

consistent=4.32, SD consistent=0.50 M divergent=4.02, SD divergent=0.46
consistent=3.58, SD consistent=0.50 M divergent=3.72, SD divergent=0.35
M experienced=4.13, SD experienced=0.58 M hypothetical=4.21, SD hypothetical=0.41, U (30, 29)=417.00, z=-0.27, p=0.789, effect size r=0.04
M experienced=3.59, SD experienced=0.42 M hypothetical=3.71, SD hypothetical=0.44, U (30, 29)=359.50, z=-1.14, p=0.256, effect size r=0.15
M experienced=0.57, SD experienced=2.11 M hypothetical=0.15, SD hypothetical=2.75, U (30, 29)=402.00, z=-0.50, p=0.622
M experienced=1.91, SD experienced=1.44 M hypothetical=2.18, SD hypothetical=1.89, U (15, 14)=77.50, z=-1.20, p=0.230
M experienced=-0.77, SD experienced=1.81 M hypothetical=-1.74, SD hypothetical=1.98, U (15, 15)=67.00, z=-1.89, p=0.059