over correction of more conservative test

Sex Differences and Emotion Regulation: An Event-Related Potential Study

Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension

pMV=.7 according Roland et al. (2007) [9]

Dissociable Effects of 5-HT2C Receptor Antagonism and Genetic Inactivation on Perseverance and Learned Non-Reward in an Egocentric Spatial Reversal Task

TLR 2 and 4 Responsiveness from Isolated Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Rats and Humans as Potential Chronic Pain Biomarkers

Infants' Somatotopic Neural Responses to Seeing Human Actions: I've Got You under My Skin

Developmental Differences in Holistic Interference of Facial Part Recognition

Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions

NMDA Receptor Antagonist Ketamine Impairs Feature Integration in Visual Perception

Hepatitis C Transmission and Treatment in Contact Networks of People Who Inject Drugs

more frequent injector across 3000 hcv simulations

A Computational Model Associating Learning Process, Word Attributes, and Age of Acquisition

Reversal Learning and Associative Memory Impairments in a BACHD Rat Model for Huntington Disease

task.2(WT n=17, TG n=17) & 6 months WT n=15, TG n=15
percentage freezing. 4 months WT n=13, TG n=13

The Longitudinal Association between Depressive Symptoms and Initiation of Insulin Therapy in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care

Examination of Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging

voxel size=0.859 x 0.859 mm slice thickness=1 mm matrix size=256*256; TE=4.38 ms; flip angle=8
TR=8530 ms, TE=81 ms, flip angle=180 deg, 256 x 256
TR=7300ms, TE=88ms, FOV=210mm, matrix=128x128, slice thickness 4mm, 26

Predictors of Response Rates to a Long Term Follow-Up Mail out Survey

participants over relatively regular intervals

Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies

I^2=96.3% manual workers - I^2=97.0% military personnel - I^2=99.0%; police - I^2=97.7% social services staff - I^2=82.6% white collar workers - I^2=91.4%
I^2=96.9% manual workers - I^2=0.9% military personnel - I^2=98.6% white collar workers - I^2=91.8%