three level nominal variable removedgraphic logistic regression

The French Version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Validity Data for Adolescents and Adults and Its Association with Non-Suicidal Self-Injury

aged 12-18 years old, M age=15.72, SD age=1.74
aged 19-31 years old, M age=23.10, SD age=2.56

Tracking Parkinson's Disease over One Year with Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Group of Older Patients with Moderate Disease

TE/TR=2.8/6.6 ms, TI=400 ms, flip angle=15
tion matrix=256*256*170, FOV=250 mm, slice thickness=1
ruction matrix=256*256*48, FOV=240 mm, slice thickness=3
ructed voxel size=1.07*1.07*3 mm^3, NEX=1
TR=6 s, echo spacing=9.2 ms, post labelling delay=1.525

Effects of Long-Term Ayahuasca Administration on Memory and Anxiety in Rats

previously described gas chromatography method

Jumping Stand Apparatus Reveals Rapidly Specific Age-Related Cognitive Impairments in Mouse Lemur Primates

Non-Invasive Measurement of Adrenocortical Activity in Blue-Fronted Parrots (Amazona aestiva, Linnaeus, 1758)

The Remapping of Time by Active Tool-Use

Nonverbal Synchrony in Social Interactions of Patients with Schizophrenia Indicates Socio-Communicative Deficits

Judged and Remembered Trustworthiness of Faces Is Enhanced by Experiencing Multisensory Synchrony and Asynchrony in the Right Order

Need for Cognitive Closure Modulates How Perceptual Decisions Are Affected by Task Difficulty and Outcome Relevance

correctness x s1 modality x s2 modality anova
s1 modality x s2 modality repeated measures anova
modality x s1 modality x s2 modality anova

AA=992 ms, WA=1085 ms, WW=1134 ms, AW=1159 ms; S1 Modality x S2
AA=696 ms, DA=802 ms, DD=1087 ms, AD=1110 ms; S1 Modality x S2
F(1,19)=0.0841, p=0.7 Correctness x S1 Modality x S2
F(1,16)=0.9772, p=0.3). removedGRAPHICremovedGRAPHIC Fig 9 shows RTs by S1 x S2 x S3
AA=951 ms, WA=977 ms, AW=982 ms, WW=1031 ms; S3 Modality x S2
AA=961ms, WA=971ms, AW=997ms, WW=1007ms; Previous S3 x S2

Task-switching Cost and Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain: Toward Understanding Individual Differences in Cognitive Flexibility