survey weighted generalised linear model

Emotional Intelligence and Prosocial Behavior in College Students: A Moderated Mediation Analysis

How Authoritarian Leadership Affects Employee's Helping Behavior? The Mediating Role of Rumination and Moderating Role of Psychological Ownership

'The New State That We Are Building': Authoritarianism and System-Justification in an Illiberal Democracy

Clarifying the Implicit Assumptions of Two-Wave Mediation Models via the Latent Change Score Specification: An Evaluation of Model Fit Indices

x<x ~=1 ; (x<x ~)=0</disp formula><disp formula id="E11">M 1 ~ N (0, 1)</disp formula><disp formula id="E12">Y 1=b y 1 m 1 M 1 + e 1</disp formula><disp formula id="E13">M 2
chi^2 can be assessed when stability=1.00
chi^2 can be assessed when both cross lagged paths=0
The Type 1 error rates werewithinthe robustness interval when both cross lags=0.00

Exploring the Relationship Between Visual Aesthetics and Social Commerce Through Visual Information Adoption Unimodel

Relationship Between Parental Marital Conflict and Social Anxiety Symptoms of Chinese College Students: Mediation Effect of Attachment

administered-707 undergraduate students Mean age=19.27, SD=0.97
chi^2 /df=5.13, tucker lewis index TLI=0.91

Home-School Cultural Value Mismatch: Antecedents and Consequences in a Multi-Ethnic Sample Transitioning to College

indirect effect=0.12 standardized indirect effect=0.07 standard error=0.07, p=0.075
indirect effect=0.12 standardized indirect effect=0.06 standard error=0.07, p=0.087
indirect effect=0.11 standardized indirect effect=0.06 standard error=0.06, p=0.073
indirect effect=0.12 standardized indirect effect=0.17 standard error=0.03, p<0.001
indirect effect=0.09 standardized indirect effect=0.15 standard error=0.03, p<0.001
indirect effect=0.13 standardized indirect effect=0.17 standard error=0.04, p<0.001
indirect effect=-0.06 standardized indirect effect=-0.10 standard error=0.02, p=0.08
indirect effect=-0.05 standardized indirect effect=-0.09 standard error=0.02, p=0.015
indirect effect=-0.06 standardized indirect effect=-0.09 standard error=0.02, p=0.007