The Mechanism of Valence-Space Metaphors: ERP Evidence for Affective Word Processing

M positive=852.895 ms, M negative=981.100
M positive=866.173 ms, M negative=967.821
M positive=1003.081 ms, M negative=1084.175
M positive=964.734 ms, M negative=1122.522
M positive=1237.531 ms, M negative=1291.642
M positive=1200.115 ms, M negative=1329.059

Combined Influence of Visual Scene and Body Tilt on Arm Pointing Movements: Gravity Matters!

times 4 angle of tilt repeated measures anova

Effects of Interface Pressure Distribution on Human Sleep Quality

achieve different interface pressure distribution model
over concentrated pressure distribution model
differences between pressure distribution model

Geometric Facial Gender Scoring: Objectivity of Perception

mutual information quotient formulation of mrmr algorithm
geodesic distances may represent 3d model

Is Body Dysmorphic Disorder Associated with Abnormal Bodily Self-Awareness? A Study Using the Rubber Hand Illusion

difference between participants baseline estimates
one factorial independent measures anova

Role of Nicotine Dependence in the Association between the Dopamine Receptor Gene DRD3 and Major Depressive Disorder

dutch ntr nesda replication sample analysis

On the Importance of Relative Salience: Comparing Overt Selection Behavior of Single versus Simultaneously Presented Stimuli

saccadic latency bin repeated measures anova

Perceived Stress Latent Factors and the Burnout Subtypes: A Structural Model in Dental Students

Attitudinal and Behavioral Characteristics Predict High Risk Sexual Activity in Rural Tanzanian Youth

Enactment versus Observation: Item-Specific and Relational Processing in Goal-Directed Action Sequences (and Lists of Single Actions)

24 unrelated single action phrases per study test
increased net recall over repeated recall test
three consecutive written free recall test

Low Level Constraints on Dynamic Contour Path Integration

path integration operates over relatively large spatial intervals

P300 Aberration in First-Episode Schizophrenia Patients: A Meta-Analysis