latency effect (T quad(1, 14)=14.4, p=.002
latency effect (T quad(1, 23)=3.2, p=.09
latency effect (T quad(1, 22)=5.5, p=.03
latency effect (T quad(1, 13)=3.8, p=.07

Momentary Conscious Pairing Eliminates Unconscious-Stimulus Influences on Task Selection

Results of Genome-Wide Analyses on Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes at Four-Year Follow-Up following Cardiac Surgery in Infancy

p<10^-5, rs10516292, an intergenic SNP approximately 16 kb from BST1

Mental Quality of Life Is Related to a Cytokine Genetic Pathway

A Single-Day Treatment with Mifepristone Is Sufficient to Normalize Chronic Glucocorticoid Induced Suppression of Hippocampal Cell Proliferation

B1. Mifepristone treatment either during ds 18-21, p<0.05
B2. Mifepristone treatment either during ds 18-21, p<0.05
reduced after 17 ds CORT, p<0.005 & after 21

Temporal Analysis of Image-Rivalry Suppression

Subconscious Visual Cues during Movement Execution Allow Correct Online Choice Reactions

bonferroni corrected paired student t test

Meditation Experience Predicts Introspective Accuracy

What Checkers Actually Check: An Eye Tracking Study of Inhibitory Control and Working Memory

4D Multi-Modality Tissue Segmentation of Serial Infant Images

most existing neonatal segmentation method

Looking for Discriminating Is Different from Looking for Looking's Sake

19 removedgraphic maximum likelihood estimates

Hand Dominance and Age Have Interactive Effects on Motor Cortical Representations

Elevated C-Reactive Protein in Children from Risky Neighborhoods: Evidence for a Stress Pathway Linking Neighborhoods and Inflammation in Children

5-HT2C Receptors in the Basolateral Amygdala and Dorsal Striatum Are a Novel Target for the Anxiolytic and Antidepressant Effects of Exercise

Sedentary/Saline=8; Sedentary/0.3 mM=8; Sedentary/2.0 mM=10; Sedentary/6.0 mM=10; Run/Saline=4; Run/0.3 mM=8; Run/2.0 mM=9; Run/6.0 mM=9
Sedentary/2.0 mM=2; Sedentary/6.0 mM=4; Run/2.0 mM=5; Run/6.0 mM=5
Sedentary/0.3 mM=7; Sedentary/2.0 mM=12; Sedentary/6.0 mM=11; Run/0.3 mM=9; Run/2.0 mM=15; Run/6.0 mM=9
Sedentary/2.0 mM=2; Sedentary/6.0 mM=1; Run/6.0 mM=3
p=0.003, i.e. exercise groups had faster average FR-1