Exploring the associations between narcissism, intentions towards infidelity, and relationship satisfaction: Attachment styles as a moderator

Factors influencing preoperative chest radiography request for elective endoscopic procedures among medical personnel

RMSEA=0.063 (<0.08) comparative fit index CFI=0.944 (<0.90

Moderate aerobic exercise, but not anticipation of exercise, improves cognitive control

Quantitative risk assessment of haemolytic uremic syndrome associated with beef consumption in Argentina

Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: A replication study

Predicting time to graduation at a large enrollment American university

hyperparameters govern 2 classes of model
effectiveness of xgboost over logistic regression

pone.0242334.e004">removedGRAPHIC F 1 score=2 Pr - Re Pr + Re</disp formula><disp formula id="pone.0242334.e005">removedGRAPHIC P r=true positive true positive + false positive</disp formula><disp formula id="pone.0242334.e006">removedGRAPHIC R e=true positive true positive + false negative</disp formula>The F 1

The safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare-Psychometric properties of the Croatian version

weighted least squares hierarchical factor analysis

Repeated Wingate sprints is a feasible high-quality training strategy in moderate hypoxia

Interrogative suggestibility in the elderly

three step hierarchical multiple regression
overall predictive accuracy of suggestibility index

Ceci (29) submitted 113 participants-62 college students M age=20.2, SD=1.12
Polczyk (28) compared 42 young adults M age=23, SD=2.77
remaining 172 participants M age=68.49; SD=8.69; 94
IR GSS-2<=20.5, then high Yield score else low Yield score correctly classified 83%

UNSW Face Test: A screening tool for super-recognizers

unlike existing face identification test

Difference normative=1.3%, p=.403, CI 95 [-0.69%, 3.34%] Lab Sample 2
Difference normative=1.49%, p=.172, CI 95 [-0.35%, 3.32%] Online Sample 1
Difference normative=3.12%, p<.001, CI 95 [2.17%, 4.06%] Online Sample 2
Memory increase=9.3%, SE=0.4 Sorting increase=7.7%, SE=0.3
Memory decrease=8.0%, SE=0.3 Sorting decrease=4.0%, SE=0.2