Serotonin transporter dependent modulation of food-seeking behavior

N=22-29. I, The behavioral attraction-0.025%

Kinematic analysis of motor learning in upper limb body-powered bypass prosthesis training

The impact of IoT security labelling on consumer product choice and willingness to pay

passwords alpha=0.71, device securement alpha=0.65

When weight is an encumbrance; avoidance of stairs by different demographic groups

Diel patterns in swimming behavior of a vertically migrating deepwater shark, the bluntnose sixgill (Hexanchus griseus)

Attentional bias for alcohol cues in visual search-Increased engagement, difficulty to disengage or both?

The relationship between stress and vitiligo: Evaluating perceived stress and electronic medical record data

Multiple trajectories of alcohol use and the development of alcohol use disorder: Do Swiss men mature-out of problematic alcohol use during emerging adulthood?

latent class analysis only allow qualitative estimations

Introducing neuromodulation in deep neural networks to learn adaptive behaviours

Effects of trap confinement on personality measurements in two terrestrial rodents

perhaps impacting behaviors exhibited during routine behavioral test

Using Andersen's behavioral model of health care utilization in a decentralized program to examine the use of antenatal care in rural western Ethiopia

Effect of voicing and articulation manner on aerosol particle emission during human speech

Affective state determination in a mouse model of colitis-associated colorectal cancer

Optogenetic mapping of feeding and self-stimulation within the lateral hypothalamus of the rat

place based laser self administration test
one factorial within subject repeated measures anova

N=32 male N ChR2=10 male N eYFP=6 female N ChR2=11 female N eYFP=5 weighing 250-400
even stronger>250% inner plumeswithina ~0.15
approximately 400% over baseline M L=2.91 +/- 0.68 vs M NL=0.71 +/- 0.29
initially about 100 illuminations subsequently about 200 illuminations per session after further laser experience M PostL=209.8 +/- 62.2 vs M PreL=100.7 +/- 36.2
more intense>250% Fos/Jun elevationswithina 0.15
differencebetweenChR2 vs eYFP groups; p<0.05