If you build it, will they come? Social, economic, and psychological determinants of COVID-19 testing decisions

household based stratified probability sampling method

In-season training responses and perceived wellbeing and recovery status in professional soccer players

A methodology for supplier selection under the curse of dimensionality problem based on fuzzy quality function deployment and interval data envelopment analysis

j U=1,</disp formula><disp formula id="pone.0253917.e012
pone.0253917.e016">removedGRAPHIC A ~ i=1 z ∑ x=1
pone.0253917.e020">removedGRAPHIC R ~ i j=∑ k=1

Food disgust sensitivity predicts disease-preventing behaviour beyond the food domain in the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

Placental DNA methylation changes and the early prediction of autism in full-term newborns

Global and local identities on the balance scale: Predicting transformational leadership and effectiveness in multicultural teams

alternative 1 factor model produced insufficient fit index
alternative 1 factor model demonstrated insufficient fit index
combination of hierarchical linear model

Differences in personality related determinants of empathetic sensibility in female and male students of medicine

davis questionnaire interpersonal reactivity index

Fin whale acoustic populations present in New Zealand waters: Description of song types, occurrence and seasonality using passive acoustic monitoring

Dogs fail to reciprocate the receipt of food from a human in a food-giving task

ICC=0.981, n observations=25, n raters=2,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001
ICC=1, n observations=8, n raters=2,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001
ICC=0.979, n observations=8, n raters=2,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001
chi^2=4.388,<italic toggle="yes">df=5,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.495; Fig 6
chi^2=0.324,<italic toggle="yes">df=0.79,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.477; Fig 7
chi^2=0.035,<italic toggle="yes">df=1,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.851; Fig 8
ICC=0.994, n observations=29, n raters=3,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001
ICC=0.988, n subjects=10, n raters=3,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001
ICC=0.983, n subjects=10, n raters=3,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001
chi^2=8.856,<italic toggle="yes">df=5,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.115; Fig 9
chi^2=1.493,<italic toggle="yes">df=1,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.222; Fig 10
chi^2=0.130,<italic toggle="yes">df=1,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.719; Fig 11