The bi-factor structure of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in persistent major depression; dimensional measurement of outcome

Frequency response areas of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus. III. Time-domain responses: Constancy, dynamics, and precision in relation to spectral resolution, and perception in the time domain

frequency slope>150 dB/octave; high frequency slope>250
frequency slope<150 dB/octave; high frequency slope<250

Evaluating the quality of evidence for gaming disorder: A summary of systematic reviews of associations between gaming disorder and depression or anxiety

definition of reliability of systematic reviews
comparing bivariable versus multivariate analysis
cross sectional versus longitudinal analysis

Uremic pruritus and long-term morbidities in the dialysis population

The effects of idealism and relativism on the moral judgement of social vs. environmental issues, and their relation to self-reported pro-environmental behaviours

b idealism=-0.33, P idealism=0.000 b relativism=0.11, P relativism=0.023
b idealism=0.23, P idealism=0.000 b relativism=-0.18, P relativism=0.000

Aripiprazole reduces liver cell division

Relationship between sedentary behaviour and anxiety symptoms among youth in 24 low- and middle-income countries

Maintaining resting cardiac fibroblasts in vitro by disrupting mechanotransduction

type="letter date">24 Jun 2020</named content>PONE D-20-17115

Familiarity with teammate's attitudes improves team performance in virtual reality

Kin recognition: Neurogenomic response to mate choice and sib mating avoidance in a parasitic wasp

Unsupervised ranking of clustering algorithms by INFOMAX

pone.0239331.e014">removedGRAPHIC D B=1 n ∑ i -1

Potentially inappropriate medication and attitudes of older adults towards deprescribing

Bayesian variable selection in linear quantile mixed models for longitudinal data with application to macular degeneration

th (0<tau<1) mixed quantile estimator can be calculated by<disp formula id="pone.0241197.e012">removedGRAPHIC min b, gamma ∑ i=1 n ∑ j=1
i=1 n ∏ j=1 n i σ exp (- σ v i j), ζ ~ ∏ i=1 n ∏ j=1
by<disp formula id="pone.0241197.e018">removedGRAPHIC arg min b, gamma ∑ i=1 n ∑ j=1
representation yield<disp formula id="pone.0241197.e025">removedGRAPHIC π gamma k | lambda 2 k=2 C 2
lambda 1 s 2 b s 2, lambda 1 s 2, if b s !=0,</disp formula><disp formula id="pone.0241197.e074">removedGRAPHIC eta k -1 | lambda 2
ta (1 + ∑ k=1 q I gamma k=0), 1 + q - ∑ k=1 q I gamma k=0
removedGRAPHIC μ^gamma k=Σ^gamma k ∑ i=1 n ∑ j=1
pone.0241197.e081">removedGRAPHIC l 0 k delta 0 gamma k + (1 - l 0 k) N k (μ^gamma k, Σ^gamma k) I gamma k k<0
i=1..., n, j=1..., n i We consider three sample sizes n=30, n i=5; n=50, n i=5; n=100, n i=5
tau=0.1, its performance drops when tau=0.3