The influence of non-family members in top management teams on research and development investment: Evidence from Chinese family firms

Binocular treatment for amblyopia: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

The effect of age on the heart rate variability of healthy subjects

squared sum of differences of successive rr intervals

yes">Ny=1..., ⎣<italic toggle="yes">N /<italic toggle="yes">s ⎦. - Step 5
scales 5<=<italic toggle="yes">s<=10 very high frequency exponent [34] -<italic toggle="yes">alpha 1
scales 10<=<italic toggle="yes">s<=50 high frequency exponent [35] -<italic toggle="yes">alpha 2
scales 50<=<italic toggle="yes">s<=200 medium frequency exponent [35]
x>12 }</disp formula><disp formula id="pone.0255894.e009
x>12 }</disp formula><disp formula id="pone.0255894.e010

Prevalence and predictors of depression, anxiety, and stress among adults in Ghana: A community-based cross-sectional study

Finding links between organisation's culture and innovation. The impact of organisational culture on university innovativeness

How the motor aspect of speaking influences the blink rate

Aggression on the psychiatric ward: Prevalence and risk factors. A systematic review of the literature

F=68.34; p<.001 and 14 days vs 7 days without further statistics [73, 91]
OR=5.49; p=.01 no confidence intervals provided [55]

Pain drawing as a screening tool for anxiety, depression and reduced health-related quality of life in back pain patients: A cohort study

Pupil responses to implied motion in figurative and abstract paintings

M=0.12 +- 0.01;<italic toggle="yes">t(3)=-4.494,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.001;<italic toggle="yes">d=0.9
M=0.11 +- 0.01;<italic toggle="yes">t(3)=-5.50,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.001;<italic toggle="yes">d=1.1
M=0.09 +- 0.1;<italic toggle="yes">t(2)=-5.38,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.001;<italic toggle="yes">d=1.1
simple IM (69% vs 77%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=7.26,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.01
no IM (69% vs 75%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=4.37,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.05
vs 54%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=32.41,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.00001
vs 65%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=10.51,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.01
static ones (65% vs 54%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=5.86,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.05
abstract artworks (18% vs 20%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=0.31,<italic toggle="yes">p>0.05
compared figurative (43% vs 18%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=70.18,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.0001
abstract paintings (43% vs 20%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=37.80,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.0001
abstract paintings (23% vs 18%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=0.14,<italic toggle="yes">p>0.5
abstract ones (25% vs 18%,<italic toggle="yes">X^<italic toggle="yes">2 (1)=4.24,<italic toggle="yes">p<0.5