Psychological distress during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ecuador: Cross-sectional study

A natural history museum visitor survey of perception, attitude and knowledge (PAK) of microbes and antibiotics

Sharing the load: How a personally coloured calculator for grapheme-colour synaesthetes can reduce processing costs

online synaesthesia battery screening test

T superimposedwithinthe 95% CI Incongruent removedGRAPHIC μ^R T=11.9 s, 95% CI (11.2 s, 12.7 s) Congruent removedGRAPHIC μ^R T=11.0 s, 95% CI (10.5 s, 11.7
I T=10.1 s, 95% CI (9.5 s, 10.8 s) Incongruent removedGRAPHIC μ^I T=10.1 s, 95% CI (9.5 s, 10.8 s) Control removedGRAPHIC μ^I T=10.0 s, 95% CI (9.4 s, 10.6
I T=10.7 s, 95% CI (10.2 s, 11.2 s) Incongruent removedGRAPHIC μ^I T=11.3 s, 95% CI (10.7 s, 12.0 s) Control removedGRAPHIC μ^I T=10.8 s, 95% CI (10.3 s, 11.4

Can 'Googling' correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search

Japan DPJ=7.45%, Japan Restoration Party JRP=3.14%, Japanese Communist Party JCP=2.94%

Influence of smoking and other cardiovascular risk factors on heart rate circadian rhythm in normotensive and hypertensive subjects

Auditory speed processing in sighted and blind individuals

groups produced inverted psychometric curve

Creating safe spaces to prevent unintentional childhood injuries among the Bedouins in southern Israel: A hybrid model comprising positive deviance, community-based participatory research, and entertainment-education

Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study

A comparative test of inequity aversion in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and dingoes (Canis dingo)

predictor variables differed across analysis
experimenter referencing behavior across conditions during test

SNR=19 dogs; NSC1=18 dogs; NSC2=16 dogs; NSNR=19
chi^2 1=9.38,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.002; Table 2
chi^2 1=6.81,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.009; Table 2
chi^2 1=20.93,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001; Table 2
chi^2 1=4.23,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.04; Table 2
chi^2 4=2.79,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.59; Fig 3
chi^2 3=17.02,<italic toggle="yes">P<0.001; Table 3
chi^2 4=5.39,<italic toggle="yes">P=0.249; Fig 3